Hands-on Activity Scrub the Scum, Save the Shine:
Engineering Motor-Driven Brushes

Quick Look

Grade Level: 8 (7-9)

Time Required: 5 hours

(five 60-minute sessions or three 90-minute sessions)

Expendable Cost/Group: US $0.00

Group Size: 3

Activity Dependency: None

Subject Areas: Measurement, Physical Science, Problem Solving, Science and Technology

NGSS Performance Expectations:

NGSS Three Dimensional Triangle
MS-ETS1-1
MS-ETS1-2
MS-ETS1-3

A photo of a student demonstrating the attachment of the toothbrush, motor, and battery.
Student demonstrating an initial prototype with toothbrush, motor, and battery attachment.
copyright
Copyright © Ella Miesner & Melinda Wright

Summary

Students are challenged to design a motor-driven brushing tool that can successfully remove “scum” from a smooth surface while maintaining surface integrity (shine). Students are introduced to the concepts of surface tension, cohesion, adhesion, and friction as they investigate the effects of surface interactions. Students are introduced to the engineering concept of criteria and constraints and the challenge of balancing conflicting goals in a single product. Students work in teams to design, quantitatively test, and iteratively improve a device that maximizes scum removal while minimizing surface wear.
This engineering curriculum aligns to Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).

Engineering Connection

Engineers, scientists, and designers collaborate to create products that meet customer needs through a blend of creativity, scientific rigor, and practical engineering. Engineers apply their deep understanding of material properties and mechanics to design products with specific functions, such as cleaning surfaces without causing damage. Scientists develop experimental protocols to test whether these products meet the criteria and constraints defined by the designers. Engineers then use iterative testing and refinement, leveraging data-driven insights to improve the design and enhance functionality, ensuring the product meets both performance standards and customer expectations. This collaborative, engineering-focused process ensures the development of effective, user-centered products.

Learning Objectives

After this activity, students should be able to:

  • Describe how the properties of different surfaces determine the frictional wear between the surfaces.
  • Explain how surface tension is related to the cohesion and adhesion between liquid and solid surfaces.
  • Evaluate engineering designs based on identified criteria and constraints to identify an optimal solution using the engineering design process.

Educational Standards

Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.

All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN), a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).

In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics; within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.

NGSS Performance Expectation

MS-ETS1-1. Define the criteria and constraints of a design problem with sufficient precision to ensure a successful solution, taking into account relevant scientific principles and potential impacts on people and the natural environment that may limit possible solutions. (Grades 6 - 8)

Do you agree with this alignment?

Click to view other curriculum aligned to this Performance Expectation
This activity focuses on the following Three Dimensional Learning aspects of NGSS:
Science & Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas Crosscutting Concepts
Define a design problem that can be solved through the development of an object, tool, process or system and includes multiple criteria and constraints, including scientific knowledge that may limit possible solutions.

Alignment agreement:

The more precisely a design task's criteria and constraints can be defined, the more likely it is that the designed solution will be successful. Specification of constraints includes consideration of scientific principles and other relevant knowledge that is likely to limit possible solutions.

Alignment agreement:

All human activity draws on natural resources and has both short and long-term consequences, positive as well as negative, for the health of people and the natural environment.

Alignment agreement:

The uses of technologies and any limitations on their use are driven by individual or societal needs, desires, and values; by the findings of scientific research; and by differences in such factors as climate, natural resources, and economic conditions.

Alignment agreement:

NGSS Performance Expectation

MS-ETS1-2. Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. (Grades 6 - 8)

Do you agree with this alignment?

Click to view other curriculum aligned to this Performance Expectation
This activity focuses on the following Three Dimensional Learning aspects of NGSS:
Science & Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas Crosscutting Concepts
Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria.

Alignment agreement:

There are systematic processes for evaluating solutions with respect to how well they meet the criteria and constraints of a problem.

Alignment agreement:

NGSS Performance Expectation

MS-ETS1-3. Analyze data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions to identify the best characteristics of each that can be combined into a new solution to better meet the criteria for success. (Grades 6 - 8)

Do you agree with this alignment?

Click to view other curriculum aligned to this Performance Expectation
This activity focuses on the following Three Dimensional Learning aspects of NGSS:
Science & Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas Crosscutting Concepts
Analyze and interpret data to determine similarities and differences in findings.

Alignment agreement:

There are systematic processes for evaluating solutions with respect to how well they meet the criteria and constraints of a problem.

Alignment agreement:

Sometimes parts of different solutions can be combined to create a solution that is better than any of its predecessors.

Alignment agreement:

Although one design may not perform the best across all tests, identifying the characteristics of the design that performed the best in each test can provide useful information for the redesign process—that is, some of the characteristics may be incorporated into the new design.

Alignment agreement:

  • Follow precisely a multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks. (Grades 6 - 8) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

  • Integrate quantitative or technical information expressed in words in a text with a version of that information expressed visually (e.g., in a flowchart, diagram, model, graph, or table). (Grades 6 - 8) More Details

    View aligned curriculum

    Do you agree with this alignment?

Suggest an alignment not listed above

Materials List

Each student needs:

Each group needs:

For the entire class to share:

  • variety of “bristle” materials (e.g., toothbrushes, hairbrushes, sponges, felt, yarn, pipe cleaners, sandpaper)
  • dry erase markers
  • double-sided foam tape at least 1 cm wide
  • cardboard/variety of paper
  • pencils/markers
  • wire strippers
  • scissors
  • glue and/or hot glue   
  • magic markers
  • (optional) craft eyes, decorations, small masses

Worksheets and Attachments

Visit [www.teachengineering.org/activities/view/uot-2873-scrub-scum-shine-materials-matter] to print or download.

Pre-Req Knowledge

Students should have a basic understanding of properties of matter (i.e., texture, volume, mass, density) and the idea that unbalanced forces (i.e., friction) cause change. This lesson builds on the common experience of tooth brushing and requires students to be aware that liquids (e.g., water) and solids (e.g., teeth) interact in specific ways. Students should have been introduced to the scientific term “surface tension” and be able to identify examples of surface tension in everyday life.

Suggested activities for building background knowledge: How Many Drops? and  Penny Perfect Properties          

Introduction/Motivation

How many times each day do you brush your teeth? Brushing is good for you—right? Discuss with your group your toothbrushing habits: How many times do you brush? What type of toothpaste do you use? What is your favorite toothbrush like? (Allow time for student discussion. All responses are appropriate at this time, as students’ dental habits may vary. This section is just an icebreaker question to get the discussion going.)

Dentists tell us to brush our teeth to prevent damage and keep our teeth strong for our whole lives, but what really causes tooth damage? Today we’re going to learn a little about tooth damage and then learn how we can use our skills as scientists and engineers to create a better toothbrush. (Distribute “What Causes Tooth Damage” Pre-Reading and have students read independently or in groups. After reading, have students complete the initial section of the Pre-Assessment to draw or describe their current understanding of the key vocabulary and begin brainstorming ideas about motor toothbrush design.)

What surprised you in the reading? (Possible answers: teeth are alive, toothbrushing can cause damage.) Where might you see examples of cohesion, adhesion, or mechanical wear in your day-to-day life? (cohesion – water droplets, toothpaste; adhesion – tape, glue; mechanical wear – treads on shoes wearing down) (This would be a good place to insert, build, or reinforce background knowledge with activities such as How Many Drops? and Penny Perfect Properties if needed.)

Properties of cohesion, adhesion, and the effects of mechanical wear play a large role in our lives, and engineers must figure out how to design products to maximize or minimize certain effects. We call these engineering needs criteria, or things we want a product to do, and constraints, or what the limits on our product design are. What might be some criteria and constraints for the design of a toothbrush? (Possible answers: criteria – needs to fit in the mouth, clean teeth well; constraints – not cause damage to teeth, not be too big.) How do engineers know if their product design meets the identified criteria and constraints? (Answer: They perform testing and measurement.)

As you read, you have been challenged to work as engineers to design a motor-driven toothbrush that is able to clean teeth surfaces—that is your criteria—but not damage the surface—that is your constraint. You will build your first prototype individually. Engineers use a process called iteration when designing. Iteration is when you take one idea, test it, and then improve it. You will iteratively improve your individual prototype by working as a team to combine the best features of each prototype to create the best possible product that you will then pitch to the Colgate Corporation to purchase. Who knows, maybe you’ll be the next toothbrush millionaire!

Procedure

Background

Cohesion and adhesion are properties of materials that affect how different substances interact with each other in the world. Cohesion is the property that makes a material “stick” to other particles of the same material. The cohesive forces of liquid molecules contribute to surface tension. Surface tension is the property that allows the surface of a liquid to resist external forces, such as when water beads on the side of a glass or small insects are able to stand on top of a body of water without falling in. Adhesion is the tendency of one material to stick to particles of another material. Adhesive tape uses the adhesion of a sticky glue to attach objects together.

In the human mouth, cohesion and adhesion of liquid saliva interact with the teeth. Saliva, which is mainly composed of water, helps to lubricate the surfaces of teeth. When you brush your teeth, the bristles of the toothbrush and the toothpaste create friction against the hard outer surface of the teeth called the enamel. The cohesive forces between water molecules in saliva help to reduce this friction, allowing the toothbrush to move smoothly over the teeth without causing excessive wear. At the same time, the enamel, which is hard and smooth, resists adhesion from foreign materials that might cause damage.

Abrasion is the special term for friction between rubbing surfaces. Abrasion between the bristles of a toothbrush and the tooth enamel can result in mechanical wear over time, which causes the surface of the enamel to become less smooth. It is easier for bacteria and acids to adhere to the rough surface of the worn tooth, which can further contribute to tooth damage and decay. Changing the material properties of the toothbrush bristles can alter the effects of brushing on the tooth surface and thus either increase or decrease mechanical wear on the tooth surface.

Before the Activity

  • Make copies of the “What Causes Tooth Damage” Pre-Reading, Pre/Post Assessment, and Individual Prototype Testing Worksheet. (1 per student)
  • Make copies of the Group Prototype Testing Worksheet. (1 per group)
  • Practice connecting the vibrating motors to the batteries.
  • (optional) Create a sample mechanical brush robot. See examples on Instructables, or see this build example video on YouTube.
  • Prepare testing materials by using double-sided tape to mount coins on a solid, nonporous surface.
  • Assemble kits of the basic materials for each student, including one motor, one battery, and a battery-sized piece of double-sided tape.
  • Assemble kits of the basic materials for each group, including one motor, one battery, and a battery-sized piece of double-sided tape.
    • It is suggested that you strip the wires from the motors and/or use a battery housing to make the construction process easier for students. Students struggle with the on/off issue of batteries’ usage, but the procedure of determining how batteries attach to motors is a helpful learning experience.
  • Gather assorted materials that could be used as bristles, including toothbrushes, and cut into small, toothbrush-sized pieces.

With the Students

Day 1: (90 minutes)

  1. Introduce the activity (see Introduction/Motivation).
  2. Give students five minutes to read the “What Causes Tooth Damage” Pre-Reading.
  3. Have students fill out the first column of the Pre/Post Assessment.
  4. Give students time to sketch their individual designs in the “design space” section of the Pre/Post Assessment
  5. Restate the challenge from the “What Causes Tooth Damage” Pre-Reading:

“Colgate Corporation, the largest toothbrush manufacturer in America (annual sales of $46.6 million) is seeking innovative designs for an electric brush that makes teeth shiny clean without causing damage to the enamel surface. You and your team are challenged to design a motor-powered brush that meets these criteria and constraints. In other words, you want a brush that scrubs the scum (bacteria and other particles that adhere to the tooth), but saves the shine (smooth surface where cohesion of the liquids in contact is greater than the adhesion of the liquids to the surface).

You will create and test a prototype, then work with a team to iterate, or change, your design to combine the best features of each design into the ultimate brushing machine. Be sure to gather data to justify your design to the Colgate Corporation and, who knows, you could be the next toothbrush millionaire!”

  1. Ask: Guide students through a discussion to “Define the Problem.” (Colgate Corporation needs a new motor-powered brush that cleans teeth but does not damage teeth.
  2. Research: Use the Brainstorming and Planning KWL Chart sheet to have students work individually or in small groups to generate ideas about topics they “need to know” to be successful in solving the problem. If time allows, have students to use internet tools or classroom materials to research answers to the “need to know” section.
  3. Imagine/Plan: Have students individually brainstorm and sketch an initial design in the “Brainstorming: My Design Sketch” section of their Brainstorming and Planning KWL Chart sheet. 
    A brainstorming sketch for a motor-driven toothbrush.
    Example of an initial design sketch from brainstorming.
    copyright
    Copyright © Ella Miesner & Melinda Wright
  4. Demonstrate the materials available. 
    A handwritten list of materials brainstormed.
    A list of materials brainstormed by students for adding after initial prototyping.
    copyright
    Copyright © Ella Miesner & Melinda Wright
  5. Create/Build: Allow students to build their own individual prototypes. Walk around the room and be available for students as they build them. 
    A photo of a student demonstrating the attachment of the toothbrush, motor, and battery.
    Student demonstrating an initial prototype with toothbrush, motor, and battery attachment.
    copyright
    Copyright © Ella Miesner & Melinda Wright
  6. Test: Go over the Prototype Testing Procedure Presentation for Test 1.
  7. Distribute one Individual Prototype Testing Worksheet for students to record data and analyze results.
  8. Have students sketch the prototype they built—not necessarily the one they initially sketched—at the top of their Individual Prototype Testing Worksheet.
  9. Give students time to test their individual prototypes.
  10. Have students record their data in their Individual Prototype Testing Worksheet.
  11. Improve: Encourage students to redesign and complete a new test for the next design if time allows.
  12. Reflection: Have students answer the “Post-Testing Reflection” questions in their Individual Prototype Testing Worksheet. (Optional: If there is not enough time, these questions can be assigned as homework.)
  13. Store bristle bots for Day 2 testing. Be sure students label their prototype with their names.

Day 2: (90 minutes)

  1. Return the individual student prototypes and testing record worksheets from Day 1 to their respective students.
  2. Group students into teams of 3 or 4.
  3. Have students assign the following group roles (See Slide 11 in Prototype Testing Procedure Presentation): materials manager, data recorder, measurement guru, and electrician.
  4. Imagine/Brainstorm: Have each student share their initial design, prototype, and test results with their group.
  5. Have students work with their team to identify the strengths of each individual design.
  6. Plan: Give students time for each group to sketch a new group design (one per group) that incorporates the best features of each individual design.
  7. Have each group sketch their group design in the Group Prototype Testing Worksheet.
  8. Create/Build: Give groups time to construct their group prototype. Follow the procedure from Day 1 for monitoring student prototype construction and testing. 
    A photo of example final product toothbrushes.
    A sampling of final toothbrush designs.
    copyright
    Copyright © Ella Miesner & Melinda Wright
  9. Test: Have each group do Test 1 in the Prototype Testing Procedure Presentation. Have them record their collected data in their Group Prototype Testing Worksheet.
  10. Have each group do Test 2 in the Prototype Testing Procedure Presentation. Have them record their collected data in their Group Prototype Testing Worksheet.
  11. Have students answer the reflection questions.

Day 3: (90 minutes)

  1. Introduce the requirements for the Product Pitch Assignment and Product Pitch Rubric.
  2. Have students work with their teams to create and practice their pitch.
  3. Optional: Have student groups present their pitches the same day, as time allows, or give groups additional time for further practice and refinement of their pitches.
  4. Optional: Have students record or electronically document their pitches for later evaluation.

Vocabulary/Definitions

abrasion: The wearing, grinding, or rubbing away caused by friction.

adhesion: The tendency of particles of one substance to stick to particles of a different, dissimilar, substance.

cohesion: The tendency of particles of a single substance to stick together.

enamel: The hard outer surface of a tooth; the part of the tooth that is exposed to mechanical wear from brushing or chemical wear from toothpaste.

iteration: The process of continual redesign based on testing and refinement of an original design.

mechanical wear: The damage to a surface caused by interaction with another material, such as by rubbing or other abrasive processes.

surface tension: A property of liquids in which molecules of one substance are more attracted to each other than to molecules of another substance.

Assessment

Pre-Activity Assessment

Brainstorming: In small groups, have students engage in open discussion about how often they brush their teeth, what kinds of toothpaste they like, and what characteristics make a good toothbrush. After providing discussion time, challenge students to think of possible negative effects of tooth brushing.

Pre-Reading: Distribute the “What Causes Tooth Damage” Pre-Reading and have students read individually or in pairs. Encourage students to identify and discuss key vocabulary terms, as indicated by underlined items in the text.

Vocabulary Pre-Teaching: After pre-reading, distribute the Pre/Post Assessment and have students record their current understanding of the key vocabulary terms, using either words or pictures.

Initial Design Sketches: Review the design challenge (found in the Introduction/Motivation section and in the text on the worksheet) and have students complete initial design sketches for a motor-driven toothbrush in the “design space” section of the worksheet.

Activity Embedded (Formative) Assessment

Prototype Testing Worksheet (Individual): After students design their initial prototypes, distribute the Individual Prototype Testing Worksheet to each student to record testing data. Review testing procedures and clarify units of measurement to use to record. After students have tested and recorded data for their original prototype, ask them to reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of their current design and how to improve it in the future.

Prototype Testing Worksheet (Group): After students have created the second version of their prototype by combining the best ideas from each individual member, they share their responses to the reflection questions on the back of their Group Prototype Testing Worksheet and identify one or two strengths of their design. Students discuss the individual design strengths and how these strengths could be combined into a single prototype that, by combining multiple beneficial design features, will (hopefully) have an overall improvement in performance. After designing and building the new group prototype, students test the new prototype and record testing results. Students reflect as a group about strengths and weaknesses of the new design and how the new design compares to the original designs in terms of performance.  

 Post-Activity (Summative) Assessment

Product Pitch: Students create a presentation, poster, or short video/audio recording that explains the benefits of their prototype to the Colgate Corporation. Presentations should include design details, scientific vocabulary, and reasoning, as well as creative effort. (See Product Pitch Rubric.)

Post-Assessment: Students revisit their Pre-Assessment vocabulary models and initial design sketches. Students draw or describe their refined understanding of the vocabulary terms in the second column. Students draw or describe their final design in the “design space” on the back and justify redesigned components related to improvements over initial design.

Safety Issues

  • Use eye protection (goggles or safety glasses) when working with liquids during this activity.
  • Use caution when handling LR44 cell batteries; keep batteries away from liquids.
  • Dispose of batteries in school-identified battery disposal receptacles; do not put them in the trash.
  • Keep batteries away from small children and pets; they are a choking/swallowing hazard.
  • Use caution with sharp materials such as scissors and wire bristles.
  • If students choose to do online research to gather ideas for designs, encourage digital safety and responsible online use. Resources are available at Common Sense Media.

Troubleshooting Tips

  • Make sure the chocolate doesn’t melt!
  • If students cannot measure the change in thickness, you can determine the wear by measuring mass before and after.
  • Duct tape can also work well to stick batteries and motors to brush heads if double-sided tape is insufficiently adhesive.
  • Turning the battery horizontal when attaching it to the base can be helpful for students with limited manual dexterity.

Activity Extensions

  • Discuss the properties of different adhesive materials used to hold the designs together (i.e., which type of tape or glue holds best?)
  • Use CAD software to design and 3D print a body/chassis for the motor-driven brush.
  • Use decision matrix for engineering design-based decision making for prototype improvement.

Activity Scaling

  • For ELL or students with special needs, have students keep a vocabulary journal to refer to during the lesson.
  • For elementary school students, you could design, create, and test a device as a class.

Additional Multimedia Support

  • To go more in-depth in explaining surface wear, use PhET friction simulation.
  • For presentations, students may use Google Slides, Canva, or other multimedia technology.

Subscribe

Get the inside scoop on all things TeachEngineering such as new site features, curriculum updates, video releases, and more by signing up for our newsletter!
PS: We do not share personal information or emails with anyone.

More Curriculum Like This

High School Lesson
Surfactants: Helping Molecules Get Along

Students learn about the basics of molecules and how they interact with each other. They learn about the idea of polar and non-polar molecules and how they act with other fluids and surfaces. Students acquire a conceptual understanding of surfactant molecules and how they work on a molecular level. ...

References

Addy, M., & Hunter, M. L. (2003). Can tooth brushing damage your health? Effects on oral and dental tissues. International Dentistry Journal, 53, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595x.2003.tb00768.

Lewis, R., & Dwyer-Joyce, R. S. (2006). Interactions between toothbrush and toothpaste particles during simulated abrasive cleaning. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 220(8), 755–765. https://doi.org/10.1243/13506501JET96

Wiegand, A., & Schlueter, N. (2014). The role of oral hygiene: Does toothbrushing harm? Monographs in Oral Science, 251–219. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360379

Zheng, Y., Bashandeh, K., Shakil, A., Jha, S., & Polycarpou, A. A. (2022). Review of dental tribology: Current status and challenges. Tribology International, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107354

Wang, R., Zhu, Y., Chen, C., Han, Y., & Zhou, H. (2022). Tooth wear and tribological investigations in dentistry. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2022, 11.

Copyright

© 2024 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2023 University of Texas at Austin

Contributors

Ella Miesner & Melinda Wright

Supporting Program

NASCENT (Nanomanufacturing Systems for Mobile Computing and Mobile Energy Technologies) Engineering Research Center, Research Experiences for Teachers Program, University of Texas at Austin

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. ECC-1160494 - a Research Experience for Teachers program titled “Nanomanufacturing Systems for Mobile Computing and Mobile Energy Technologies or NASCENT.” Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Last modified: October 23, 2024

Free K-12 standards-aligned STEM curriculum for educators everywhere.
Find more at TeachEngineering.org