Quick Look
Grade Level: 5 (5-7)
Time Required: 45 minutes
Expendable Cost/Group: US $0.00 This activity uses non-expendable (reusable) LEGO MINDSTORMS robot kits and software; see the Materials List for details.
Group Size: 3
Activity Dependency:
Subject Areas: Biology, Science and Technology
NGSS Performance Expectations:
| 4-LS1-2 |
| MS-LS1-8 |
Quick Look 
- Grade Level:
- 5 (5 – 7)
- Time Required:
- 45 minutes
- Group Size:
- 3
- Subject Areas:
-
Biology Science and Technology -
NGSS Performance Expectations:
4-LS1-2 MS-LS1-8
Summary
This activity helps students understand how a LEGO® MINDSTORMS® robot moves using motors and wheels. Then students relate the concepts of decision-making actuation and motion in humans to their parallels in mechanized robots, and understand the common themes associated with movement.Engineering Connection
An important aspect of biological engineering and neuroscience is the ability to view the human body as a functioning, controlled system. Engineers use this systems approach when building robots. More and more research findings indicate that mathematical principles similar to those used in robotics are extremely useful or even necessary for a complete understanding of the human body. Within such fields as biological engineering, systems and neurobiology, engineers are becoming increasingly involved in research involving the human body and efforts to replicate the functioning of many of its systems.
Learning Objectives
After this activity, students should be able to:
- Compare the functions of the components involved in movement in both a human body and in a robot.
- Program an EV3 robot to move based on the input it receives from a sensor.
Educational Standards
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science,
technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN),
a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics;
within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
Each TeachEngineering lesson or activity is correlated to one or more K-12 science, technology, engineering or math (STEM) educational standards.
All 100,000+ K-12 STEM standards covered in TeachEngineering are collected, maintained and packaged by the Achievement Standards Network (ASN), a project of D2L (www.achievementstandards.org).
In the ASN, standards are hierarchically structured: first by source; e.g., by state; within source by type; e.g., science or mathematics; within type by subtype, then by grade, etc.
NGSS: Next Generation Science Standards - Science
| NGSS Performance Expectation | ||
|---|---|---|
|
4-LS1-2. Use a model to describe that animals' receive different types of information through their senses, process the information in their brain, and respond to the information in different ways. (Grade 4) Do you agree with this alignment? |
||
| Click to view other curriculum aligned to this Performance Expectation | ||
| This activity focuses on the following Three Dimensional Learning aspects of NGSS: | ||
| Science & Engineering Practices | Disciplinary Core Ideas | Crosscutting Concepts |
| Use a model to test interactions concerning the functioning of a natural system. Alignment agreement: | Different sense receptors are specialized for particular kinds of information, which may be then processed by the animal's brain. Animals are able to use their perceptions and memories to guide their actions. Alignment agreement: | A system can be described in terms of its components and their interactions. Alignment agreement: |
| NGSS Performance Expectation | ||
|---|---|---|
|
MS-LS1-8. Gather and synthesize information that sensory receptors respond to stimuli by sending messages to the brain for immediate behavior or storage as memories. (Grades 6 - 8) Do you agree with this alignment? |
||
| Click to view other curriculum aligned to this Performance Expectation | ||
| This activity focuses on the following Three Dimensional Learning aspects of NGSS: | ||
| Science & Engineering Practices | Disciplinary Core Ideas | Crosscutting Concepts |
| Gather, read, and synthesize information from multiple appropriate sources and assess the credibility, accuracy, and possible bias of each publication and methods used, and describe how they are supported or not supported by evidence. Alignment agreement: | Each sense receptor responds to different inputs (electromagnetic, mechanical, chemical), transmitting them as signals that travel along nerve cells to the brain. The signals are then processed in the brain, resulting in immediate behaviors or memories. Alignment agreement: | Cause and effect relationships may be used to predict phenomena in natural systems. Alignment agreement: |
International Technology and Engineering Educators Association - Technology
-
Describe how a subsystem is a system that operates as part of another, larger system.
(Grades
3 -
5)
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
-
Explain how various relationships can exist between technology and engineering and other content areas.
(Grades
3 -
5)
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
State Standards
Missouri - Science
-
Explain the interactions between the nervous and muscular systems when an organism responds to a stimulus
(Grade
8)
More Details
Do you agree with this alignment?
Materials List
- LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 robot, such as the EV3 core Set (5003400) at https://education.lego.com/en-us/products/lego-mindstorms-education-ev3-core-set/5003400#lego-mindstorms-education-ev3
- LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 Software version 1.3.1, available for free at https://www.lego.com/en-us/mindstorms/downloads/download-software
- computer, loaded with EV3 1.3.1 software
Alternative: LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT Set:
Note: This activity can also be conducted with the older (and no longer sold) LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT set instead of EV3; see below for those supplies:
- LEGO MINDSTORMS NXT Base Set
- computer loaded with the NXT 2.1 software
Worksheets and Attachments
Introduction/Motivation
See the Are We Like Robots? associated lesson for the activity introduction.
Procedure
Refer to the Understanding Movement in Humans and Robots Presentation (a PowerPoint file) to conduct this activity.
Before the Activity
- Make copies of the Movement in Robots Worksheet and the Post Activity Worksheet.
- Build a bevelbot for each group, as explained in the How to Build a LEGO EV3 Bevelbot. If you have an extra day, have the students follow the instructions to put together the bevelbots.
- Program one bevelbot as described in the LEGO EV3 Software Tutorial.
With the Students
- Divide the class into groups of three or four students each.
- Introduce the class to the LEGO EV3 robot (bevelbot) as describe on slide 8.
- Introduce the EV3 brick as the brain of the robot. However, this "brain" must be programmed, unlike humans who learn from experiences. Explain that it is the user-defined programming that tells the brick what to do (slide 9).
- Introduce the equivalent of nerves in a robot (slide 10).
- Introduce robot equivalents to humans (slide 11).
- Explain how motors help robots move. Ask the class to compare the way robots move to the way people move (slides 12 -13).
- Have everyone set up the LEGO EV3 bevelbots on the floor. Explain the engineering challenge: To make the robot move towards a wall, sense the wall once it gets close and back up when it is too close to a wall (slide 14).
- Explain the working of the ultrasonic sensor and start programming (slide 15).
- Walk the class through basic programming of the bevelbot (slide 16).
- Direct students on how to start the program they downloaded on the EV3 brick and have students explain what they told their robot to do (slide 17).
- Have students sit in groups and pass out the Movement in Robots Worksheet in (slide 18-19). Solutions to the activity sheet questions are given in slide 20.
- Talk about energy sources in humans and robots (slide 21).
- Compare the process of deciding to move in humans and robots (slide 22).
- Provide a summary of humans vs. robots (slide 23). Ask students identify some other ways in which robots are similar to human brains.
- Administer the post-activity worksheet (slide 24).
Vocabulary/Definitions
biceps: The muscle on the upper inside of the upper arm coming from two heads.
EV3: Programmable "computer" brick that controls a LEGO robot.
hamstring: Any of three muscles at the back of the thigh that function to flex and rotate the leg and extend the thigh.
limb: The arm or leg of a human being.
quadriceps: The muscle in front of the thigh, divided into four parts.
robot: A mechanism guided by automatic controls.
system: A group of interdependent components functioning as a unified whole; a set of methods or rules governing behavior.
tendon: A band of connective tissue that unites a muscle with some other body part (such as bone) and transmits the force exerted by muscles.
triceps: The muscle on the lower outside of the upper arm coming from three heads.
Assessment
Pre-Activity Questioning: To find out student preconceptions and base knowledge, ask students in a group setting about their knowledge of brain anatomy, computer parts and EV3 sensors, and write student responses on the board.
Worksheet: Administer the Student Post-Activity Worksheet (slide 24).
Post-Activity Game: Conduct the Jeopardy Game by using the Jeopardy - Understanding Movement in Humans and Robots PowerPoint file, which is designed to play an entire game of Jeopardy using lesson and activity content.
- Divide the class into groups of two to four student each.
- During each group's turn, ask them to choose a category.
- Use the mouse left key to click on the "student choice" to reveal a jeopardy question. Click on the "question" icon on the slide to reveal the correct answer.
Troubleshooting Tips
Troubleshooting is an important part of programming. This activity provides many opportunities for students to learn to find problems on their own, with some teacher guidance if necessary. If a group is having trouble programming, ask them to explain to you what the program does, starting at the beginning. While they are explaining, look at their program to make sure it matches the explanation. If you are not sure what a part of the program means, refer to the EV3 reference guide or legoengineering.com.
Subscribe
Get the inside scoop on all things TeachEngineering such as new site features, curriculum updates, video releases, and more by signing up for our newsletter!More Curriculum Like This
Students explore the similarities between how humans move and walk and how robots move, so they come to see the human body as a system from an engineering point-of-view.
Through six lesson/activity sets, students learn about the functioning of sensors, both human and robotic. The overall framework reinforces the theme of the human body as a system with sensors—that is, from an engineering perspective.
Students learn about human reflexes, how our bodies react to stimuli and how some body reactions and movements are controlled automatically, without thinking consciously about the movement or responses. In the associated activity, students explore how reflexes work in the human body by observing an ...
Students learn about the similarities between the human brain and its engineering counterpart, the computer. Since students work with computers routinely, this comparison strengthens their understanding of both how the brain works and how it parallels that of a computer.
Copyright
© 2013 by Regents of the University of Colorado; original © 2009 Curators of the University of MissouriContributors
Ajay Nair; Charlie Franklin; Ashwin Mohan; Satish NairSupporting Program
GK-12 Program, Computational Neurobiology Center, College of Engineering, University of MissouriAcknowledgements
This curriculum was developed under National Science Foundation GK-12 grant no. DGE 0440524. However, these contents do not necessarily represent the policies of the National Science Foundation, and you should not assume endorsement by the federal government.
Last modified: October 17, 2020
User Comments & Tips